Start free trial
Research

Reps do not skip the hard questions. They skip the easy one.

An analysis of 29,444 scored sales calls shows that discovery is largely solved: budget and timeline come up in 98% of conversations. The weak point is the final thirty seconds. Only 68% of calls end with an agreed next step, and the calls that do score 18 points higher on average.

n = 29,444 calls Source: Canarics Sales Published 2026-11-12

Key findings

98%
of calls covered budget and timeline
68%
of calls ended with an agreed next step
76 vs 58
average score with and without a next step
1 in 3
calls do the work and then simply end

Methodology

Sample. 29,444 recorded sales calls between human sales representatives and prospects or customers, captured at the carrier level and analyzed by Canarics Sales. Calls span multiple languages (Latvian, Russian, Lithuanian, Estonian and English) and multiple client teams. Aggregates only; no team is identifiable.

Scoring. Each call is transcribed and scored 0 to 100 against a structured sales framework (SPIN or PACT, depending on the team) with per-dimension sub-scores. Two dimensions are examined here:

Analysis. We split the sample by whether a next step was agreed and compared group size and mean overall score. This is observational data; see the limitations section before reading the score gap as a causal effect.

Finding 1: Discovery is happening

Budget and timeline, the two questions sales training spends the most effort on, were raised in 98% of calls. n = 29,444

The common assumption that representatives shy away from the uncomfortable commercial questions does not hold in this sample. Whatever the cause (training, scripts, the fact that scoring makes the omission visible), the discovery stage is being executed at near-saturation. Further coaching investment here has a low ceiling.

Finding 2: One call in three ends without a next step

Call outcomeCallsShareMean score
Next step agreed20,05068.1%76
No next step agreed9,39431.9%58
Total29,444100% 

9,394 conversations asked every question, built the case, and then ended with no commitment on either side. The representative did the expensive part of the call and skipped the cheap part. The next step is a single sentence, and it is the one most often left out.

Finding 3: The gap is 18 points, and it comes from the last thirty seconds

Mean overall call score, 0 to 100. n = 20,050 and 9,394.

Calls with an agreed next step averaged 76. Calls without averaged 58. The two groups are not separated by how well the representative ran the conversation for the first twenty minutes; both groups cleared the discovery bar at the same rate. They are separated by what happened at the end.

Limitations

The score is partly circular. The overall score includes a closing dimension, so a call with an agreed next step is scored higher partly by definition. The direction of the gap is robust; its size is inflated, and we do not claim 18 points as a causal effect of asking for the next step.

What is not inflated is the 32%. The share of calls that end with no next step is a direct count, independent of the scoring model. It is the number a sales manager can act on.

Observational, single platform. All calls were scored by one analysis model under one definition of "next step agreed". Different definitions will produce different rates. Teams that use Canarics Sales may already differ from the population of sales teams at large.

What distinguishes the calls that close

From the 20,050 calls that did secure a next step, three patterns recur.

A next step is a date and an owner, not a feeling

"We should talk again" is a sentiment. "Tuesday at 10, I will bring the revised quote" is a commitment. The calls at the top of the distribution name a time, a deliverable and a person for each side.

A specific ask outperforms an open one

"Does Tuesday at 10 work?" consistently outperforms "shall we talk again soon?"

A closed question with a concrete proposal is easy to accept and easy to counter with an alternative. An open question invites deferral, and deferral is where the 32% comes from.

A clean no is a next step too

When the honest answer is that there is no next step, the strongest calls say so out loud and log it. A documented "not now, revisit in Q2" keeps the pipeline accurate and the relationship intact. An undocumented "let us stay in touch" does neither.

Implications for sales managers

  1. Measure the next-step rate, not the discovery rate. Discovery coverage at 98% leaves almost nothing to coach. Next-step rate at 68% leaves a third of all conversations.
  2. Coach the last thirty seconds. The fix is a sentence, not a methodology. Review call endings specifically.
  3. Count your own number before guessing it. When asked, most managers estimate their team's next-step rate above 68%. The measured figure is usually lower than the estimate.

Citation

Canarics (2026). Reps do not skip the hard questions. They skip the easy one: next-step rate in 29,444 scored sales calls. canarics.com/sales-call-next-step-rate. Figures on this page are free to cite with a link. Methodology for the broader dataset: canarics.com/insights.

What is your team's next-step rate?
Canarics Sales scores every recorded call and reports it by representative in the first month. Measured, not estimated.
Request a demo